Skip to main content RSS Info Close Search Facebook Twitter
Location
Category
Providers / Vacancies
Feedback

Flexible housing for ageing population

Australia may have enough large family homes and now needs smaller, more flexible, higher density housing, according to one of the nation’s leading demographers.

The call follows a recent paper by the University of Adelaide's Professor Graeme Hugo AO on the changing demographics of Australia over the past 30 years, published in the Australasian Journal on Ageing.

Professor Hugo, who is director of the Australian Population and Migration Research Centre at the University, has analysed a range of demographic trends in the period 1981-2011, including population growth, life expectancy, migration, population distribution and household composition.

Professor Hugo says Australia's ageing population is largely not being factored into planning and policy.

“The physical stock of our houses is out of kilter with the reality of our population changes,” Professor Hugo says.

“What Australia desperately needs is growth in more flexible housing for one to two people. This is mostly driven by the baby boomer population – a quarter of our population is either moving into retirement or is already in retirement. They’re at a stage when many wish to be downsizing, moving into accommodation that better suits their needs and lifestyle.

“Baby boomers could play an important role in increasing the density of population in Australian cities. By all means, older people who wish to stay in the family home should be enabled to do so, but there is evidence that some baby boomers are seeking a change in housing after their children leave home.

“This would free up family housing for young families while helping to drive a much needed boost in higher density, inner city living. Importantly, it will help stop the spread of our everwidening suburbs,” he says.

Professor Hugo says that since 1981, what many Australians consider to be the ‘typical’ household has experienced the slowest growth.

“In 1981, just over 47% of households had one or two people, but by 2011 this increased to more than 58%.

“Australian planning is aimed predominantly at the stereotypical 'average' household. However, the figures show a very different picture of our population's needs, and it's time we stopped ignoring those changes so that adequate housing and services can be provided,” Professor Hugo says.

Share this article

Read next

Subscribe

Subscribe to our Talking Aged Care newsletter to get our latest articles, delivered straight to your inbox
  1. Data from a recently released report highlights a concerning...
  2. With an ageing and growing population, data from the...
  3. Approximately 411,000 Australians are estimated to be living...
  4. How could you benefit from attending university as an older...
  5. Fueling your body with healthy foods as you age could help...
  6. If you believe you have reached a point of it being too unsafe...

Recent articles

  1. What is the expected impact of the changes to the upcoming...
  2. Recently published retirees prove that it’s never too...
  3. In the last decade, people aged 65 years or older were...
  4. What caused an increase in the number of calls to advocacy...
  5. Managing your medications may seem difficult but it...
  6. Dementia Australia’s free information sessions can help...
  7. Waiting to update your will and other legal documents could...
  8. Palliative care allows Australians at the end of their lives...
  9. Telstra and Optus are closing their 3G networks on October 28,...
  10. Tax returns must be completed by the end of the months and...
  11. Rental stress is affecting the aged care workers that are...
  12. Why is the Victorian Government providing free public...
  1. {{ result.posted_at | timeago }}

Sorry, no results were found
Perhaps you misspelled your search query, or need to try using broader search terms.
Please type a topic to search
Some frequently searched topics are "dementia", "elderly" etc
Close